01
Compose
Automated analytical brief construction
Turns a casual, natural-language question into a structured analytical brief in under fifteen seconds. The prompt penalty disappears entirely.
Adjudicated Intelligence.
Four frontier models investigate independently. A fifth uses the Proprietary TAM protocol to hold them accountable and examines their work. You get a verdict with analysis, opinion and next steps in the deliverable format you need.
5 free credits on sign-up. No card required.
$89 per month · founding membership
Getting Started
I
One sentence in, a scoped master prompt out. The brief generator builds the analytical structure for you — and all four models receive it identically, so the only variable left in the experiment is the model itself.
II
Four frontier models take that brief at the same time and in isolation — no shared draft, no sight of each other's work, no consensus pressure.
III
A referee protocol cross-examines all four. It starts where they disagree, audits whether agreement is genuine, then verifies its own reasoning by the same standard.
IV
A chaptered dossier rather than a chat log — navigable, publication-grade, exportable in one click, ending with the two questions worth asking next.
Acts two and three, running as they actually run
The US offshore fabrication sector presents a defined entry window for precision component suppliers with established quality certifications. ASME and API compliance are table stakes. The differentiator is lead-time reliability - domestic suppliers consistently outperform on schedule adherence versus Asian alternatives. Target: tier-1 EPC contractors managing Gulf of Mexico projects.
Entry strategy hinges on certification sequencing. ASME Section VIII before API 6A. The procurement cycle for offshore fabricators runs 18-24 months from qualification to first PO. Budget accordingly. Early relationship with a tier-2 distributor accelerates this materially - they carry approved vendor list influence without requiring the full contractor engagement overhead.
Agree on certification priority sequencing. The distributor risk identified is real but manageable with exclusivity terms on specific product categories - common in stainless precision markets. Geographic focus matters: Gulf Coast fabricators operate under different vendor dynamics than Pacific Northwest yards. Entry point selection is as important as channel selection.
The consensus on distributor-led entry overlooks a structural risk: distributors in this sector routinely warehouse competing suppliers and will not prioritise a new entrant over an established one. Direct EPC engagement, while slower, builds a relationship the distributor cannot later reassign. The qualification timeline assumption of 18 months may be optimistic post-2023 procurement tightening.
Numbered in the order the work happens, not in order of importance. Every one of these ships to founding members on day one.
01
Compose
Turns a casual, natural-language question into a structured analytical brief in under fifteen seconds. The prompt penalty disappears entirely.
02
Investigate
Four frontier models run simultaneously on the same brief, and the workspace takes whatever file formats the analysis needs attached to it.
02a
Investigate
Talk one-to-one with any individual model for the casual work, then escalate the same thread to full four-model adjudication without leaving the workspace.
03
Adjudicate
An adversarial referee across all four. It prioritises disagreement, audits consensus for shared internet echoes, self-audits its own reasoning, and surfaces the Expert Position — the blind spot every individual model missed.
04
Adjudicate
Analyze returns a deep, self-auditing ruling on a complex situation. Create turns the cross-examined research into an actionable, board-ready asset.
04a
Adjudicate
Push back on the adjudicator alone, or send the follow-up back out to the entire four-model investigator panel. You choose who answers.
05
Deliver
A publication-grade document canvas in place of an endless-scroll chat terminal — executive multi-chapter layout with a sticky quick-link side navigation.
05a
Deliver
The full deliberation or a single chapter, out in one click as PDF, Word or slides. Ready to circulate, not ready to reformat.
06
Deliver
Surgical follow-ups drawn from exactly where the four models clashed, so you probe the critical logic dependencies instead of accepting a generic formatting shortcut.
07
Deliver
Select up to three independent past deliberations — market entry, regulatory risk, AI strategy — and merge them into one master file without re-ruling a single historical decision.
08
Throughout
Learns your professional role, risk tolerance, decision-making style and preferred analytical depth over time, with no training to do. It travels with every query, and you can view, edit, pause or permanently delete it.
—
All eleven, day one
Every feature on this grid is in the membership at $89 a month. Nothing here is held back for a higher plan, because there isn't one.
Who is asking
Two numbers you already know. Set your hourly rate and how long one multi-model research query takes you now. Industry standard for a typical full manual analysis is between 2.5 and 4 hours.
Loaded cost of the person doing the research, not their salary.
Prompting four models by hand, reading four answers, reconciling them.
Per query
Membership is $89 a month. Your share of it is already inside the SimulQ figure above.
05 · Founding cohort
$89per month
Cost comparisons are modeled, not measured, and assume 150 minutes of support-staff time for a manual four-model workflow against 3 minutes through SimulQ, valued at $34.24 per hour. Your own time, rate and workflow will differ. © 2026 SimulQ.