SimulQ

Intelligence Beyond Consensus

SimulQ, simulq.ai

The interrogated AI platform

Four latest frontier models investigate independently. A fifth uses the Proprietary TAM protocol to hold them accountable and examines their work. You get a verdict without groupthink, analysis without wandering and opinion without hallucination. SimulQ delivers guaranteed adjudication and produces information you can rely on.

Start free trial↗

Getting Started

5 free credits on sign-up. No card required.

$89 per month · founding membership

The SimulQ System
Your query.
The models are the
Raw Material
The TAM protocol is the
Processing Plant
Your output is your
Product
Brief
Composer
GPT
Gemini
Sonar
Grok
TAM Protocol
Active
Disagreement first
Consensus auditing
The expert position
Self-auditing verification
TAM Verdict · Delivered
PDF
PDF
W
Word
X
Excel
P
PowerPoint
01The whole method, in four acts

Compose. Investigate. Adjudicate. Deliver.

I

Compose

The brief generator builds the analytical structure for you, and all four models receive it identically, so the only variable left in the experiment is the model itself.

II

Investigate

Four frontier models take that brief at the same time and in isolation. No shared draft, no sight of each other's work, no consensus pressure.

III

Adjudicate

A referee protocol cross-examines all four. It starts where they disagree, audits whether agreement is genuine, then verifies its own reasoning by the same standard.

IV

Deliver

A chaptered document rather than a chat log. Navigable, publication-grade, exportable in one click, ending with the two questions worth asking next.

The SimulQ Analyze workspace: the composed brief on the left, the four model replies in the middle, and the TAM analysis on the right.
02Everything inside the membership

The complete build.

Numbered in the order the work happens, not in order of importance. Every one of these ships to founding members on day one.

01

Compose

Automated prompt

Turns a casual, natural-language question into a structured analytical prompt in under fifteen seconds. The prompt penalty disappears entirely.

02

Investigate

Four parallel frontier investigators

Four frontier models run simultaneously on the same prompt, and the workspace takes whatever file formats the analysis needs attached to it.

02a

Investigate

Single-model direct chat and escalation

Talk one-to-one with any individual model for the casual work, then escalate the same thread to full four-model adjudication without leaving the workspace.

03

Adjudicate

The proprietary TAM protocol

An adversarial referee across all four. It prioritises disagreement, audits consensus for shared internet echoes, self-audits its own reasoning, and surfaces the Expert Position, the blind spot every individual model missed.

04

Adjudicate

Dual output: analyze or create

Analyze returns a deep, self-auditing ruling on a complex situation. Create turns the cross-examined research into an actionable asset.

04a

Adjudicate

Flexible panel interaction

Push back on the adjudicator alone, or send the follow-up back out to the entire four-model investigator panel. You choose who answers.

05

Deliver

The chaptered output

A publication-grade document canvas in place of an endless-scroll chat terminal. Executive multi-chapter layout with a sticky quick-link side navigation.

05a

Deliver

Usable document outputs

The full deliberation or a single chapter, out in one click as PDF, Word or slides. Ready to circulate, not ready to reformat.

06

Deliver

Divergence-driven questions

Surgical follow-ups drawn from exactly where the four models clashed, so you probe the critical logic dependencies instead of accepting a generic formatting shortcut.

07

Deliver

Multi-thread history merging

Select up to three independent past deliberations (market entry, regulatory risk, AI strategy) and merge them into one master file without re-ruling a single historical decision.

08

Throughout

The personal brief, silently calibrated

Learns your professional role, risk tolerance, decision-making style and preferred analytical depth over time, with no training to do. It travels with every query, and you can view, edit, pause or permanently delete it.

 

All eleven, day one

No tiers. No add-ons.

Every feature on this grid is in the membership at $89 a month. Nothing here is held back for a higher plan, because there isn't one.

Start free trial↗

03

Typical Industry Uses for SimulQ.

Sector, role and responsibility

Who is asking

Analyze

Create

100 questions · 5 AI systems · blind evaluation

Its weakest category beat
their strongest.

Across every dimension measured, the adjudicated verdict scored higher than the average individual model. SimulQ's lowest score — 9.19 on dissent engagement — still sits above the individual models' best of 8.08. The two sets do not overlap.

Individual model average SimulQ Scored 0–10 · full scale shown

Individual-model figures are the mean of the four panel models answering the same question independently · verdicts and raw answers were anonymised and randomly ordered before grading · 10-point rubric · full methodology, question set and judge roster publish with the benchmark

05 · Founding cohort

Start your free trial.

then$89per month